{"created":"2023-07-25T09:58:18.713515+00:00","id":1381,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"a5e9e497-3930-4853-a59f-6d795afa2819"},"_deposit":{"created_by":16,"id":"1381","owners":[16],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"1381"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:oacis.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001381","sets":["187:189:212","89:128:199"]},"author_link":["549"],"item_6_alternative_title_23":{"attribute_name":"タイトル(ヨミ)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"ミナミシナカイ フンソウ ニカンスル チュウサイ サイバンショ サイテイ"}]},"item_6_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2017-02-28","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"75","bibliographicPageStart":"65","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"13","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"東京海洋大学研究報告"},{"bibliographic_title":"Journal of the Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_6_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"On July 12, 2016, the Arbitral Tribunal issued an arbitration award on the South China Sea Dispute between China and the Philippines. It concluded that China’s historic rights to resources in the maritime areas within the so-called “Nine-dash Line” are incompatible with the International Convention of the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS） and have no legal effect. At the same time, the Tribunal acknowledged that all high-tide features in the Spratly Islands are not entitled to an exclusive economic zone and continental shelf and that no overlapping entitlements exist in the maritime zones claimed by the Philippines. After giving the background and general outline of the Award, this paper examines the reasoning of the judgment, in particular the strict standards set by the Court when applying the article 121（ 3） of UNCLOS about the status of maritime features.\n　2016年7月12日に、仲裁裁判所は中国とフィリピンとの間における南シナ海紛争についての仲裁裁定を下した。その中で法廷は、中国のいわゆる九断線内の海域における資源に対する歴史的権利が国連海洋法条約とは両立せず、中国が主張する権利には法的根拠がないと結論付けた。更に法廷は、スプラトリー諸島における高潮線上の島嶼のすべてが排他的経済水域及び大陸棚に対する権限を有せず、フィリピンが主張する海域には権原の重複が存在しないことを認めた。\n　本稿は本裁定の背景と概要について紹介すると共に、今回の裁定における論拠、とりわけ島嶼の地位に関する国連海洋法条約121条3項を適用する際に設定された厳格な基準について考察した。","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_6_description_6":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"東京海洋大学学術研究院海洋政策文化学部門","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_6_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"東京海洋大学"}]},"item_6_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA12066872","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_6_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"2189-0951","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_6_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"稲本, 守"},{"creatorName":"イナモト, マモル","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"},{"creatorName":"Inamoto, Mamoru","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{},{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2017-02-28"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"AA12066872-13-6.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"392.3 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"AA12066872-13-6","url":"https://oacis.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/1381/files/AA12066872-13-6.pdf"},"version_id":"a6d2887d-5147-428b-818e-335a7ef802b4"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"南シナ海","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"スプラトリー諸島","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"仲裁裁定","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"South China Sea","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Spratly Islands","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Arbitration Award","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper"}]},"item_title":"南シナ海紛争に関する仲裁裁判所裁定","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"南シナ海紛争に関する仲裁裁判所裁定"},{"subitem_title":"South China Sea Arbitration Award: An Analysis","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"6","owner":"16","path":["199","212"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2017-02-28"},"publish_date":"2017-02-28","publish_status":"0","recid":"1381","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["南シナ海紛争に関する仲裁裁判所裁定"],"weko_creator_id":"16","weko_shared_id":16},"updated":"2023-07-25T10:55:50.686181+00:00"}